![[Remember RMS Titanic, by Steinar D. Varsi]](../graphics/bannernetwork.gif)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
No matter what, in the hours before Titanic set sail into the history, they got several messages
from various ships about observations of icebergs. During this particular afternoon they got no less than
six messages about icebergs. Why did Titanic maintain as high speed as 20 knots, even after the
darkness of night came? (20 knots equals 33 feet/sec, and a ship of 46.000 brt. don't stop on a penny!).
Captain Smith could have had personal reasons for this. After all, this was his last voyage before
retirement, and the possibility to end it with an new record across the Atlantic (arrival New York
Thursday evening instead of Wednesday afternoon) might have seemed great. And for the White Star Line this would have been a great
Public Relation, they were to compete with others in the traffic across the Atlantic. And the struggle
for power were not much different than it is today. (But those days, the motto was 'Go Ahead or Jump Off'. Besides, the RMS Titanic was not capable of a speed over 21-22-knots.)
- Some speculators indicate that the White Star Line were so near bankruptcy, that they sacrificed Titanic
, so they could collect the money from the insurance company later. (This might be a rather doubtful
explanation since they always paid all their bills in time who ever they owed money.)
- What about the other conspiracy theories?
- Was it all planned?
- How severe
damage did the iceberg do?
- Did it hit a weak point in the hull?
- Couldn't the rivets hold the pressure
from the iceberg?
- Or did the iceberg tear up a long and wide rupture in the hull?
In 1994 some scientists discovered something
that might explain why RMS Titanic sunk and sunk so fast. They analyzed a piece of the hull,
collected from the grave of Titanic and compared this with plates from more modern ships. First
they did a stretching-test, but the results showed no particular difference (neither did it at H &
W in 1910). But when they were to bend the plates, something happened. The piece recovered from
Titanic broke in pieces!
A closer investigation showed that the steel plates contained a great amounts of
sulphur and this makes the steel brittle when you try to bend it.
An International team of scientists and engineers repeatedly
dived the Titanic wreck in August 1996. These scientists used sonar to
peer through the mud in an attempt to find exactly what damage was in
the starboard bow of the ship. The findings showed six small openings
in the side of the starboard hull. You can read more about this in
Nic Wilson's pages in Australia.
Is this grave robbery? Is it scientific investigation? Is it morally acceptable to recover artefacts from
Titanic and sell it as souvenirs?
My personal opinion is: This is a grave.
Titanic was an exciting and a great ship that disappeared in a very tragic way,
and that no one ever expected to seen again. When she later was found, I hoped she would get her peace
at last. The artefacts (or 'debris' that they call it so they don't offend someone....) that the latest
expeditions have recovered is purely grave robbery in my opinion. Not so very long ago (28.Sept. 1994) another
ship-disaster took place, this time in the Baltic Sea with
MS Estonia.
As time fled by, I followed the discussions
about recovering the remains of the passengers with strong feelings. And my feelings got even stronger
when I heard the survivors telling about the disaster and the feelings they now had to live with, and how
the relatives of the desisted wanted to bring up their loved ones.